The Black Cat (1934)

A young couple find themselves stuck in the path of a vengeful psychiatrist who wants to get back at a demonic architect for taking everything away for him.

Even though Lugosi and Karloff portray their characters very well, the real star is the house. With it’s art deco and expressionist touches, mixed with the old war battlements, the house sets give a very surrealist and almost evil feeling to it where “even the phones are dead”. Director Edgar Ulmer also plays a grand part. He directed this movie as well as written it very well. The conversations between Lugosi and Karloff are almost like knife fights.

The only fault with this movie is that it’s too short. I’m pretty sure things could have been fleshed out a bit more. Maybe more conversations during the chess match or a monologue about how the war has affected them. I think that Karloff’s satanic intentions could have been worked upon as well. Almost anything about the characters of Hjalmar and Vitus would have been great.

This is a “have” in your collection. Not only for Lugosi and Karloff, but also for Ulmer, who later on, becomes the forefather of Giallo.

4 stars.

The Raven (1935)

A famous plastic surgeon who has a thing for Edgar Allen Poe, falls in love with one of his patients, whose father is a famous judge. The judge denies this love and the surgeon sends a criminal to do his dirty work as trade to fix his face.

This is the second meeting of Boris Karloff and Bela Lugosi. I don’t know what to say really about this film. It’s an alright movie , but it just…it just seems that they’re forcefully trying to get back the magic of the actors’ first meeting except the roles are reversed. I mean, the story is ok. The story is great, it’s just that it just didn’t feel like enough was involved.

I think one of the problems is that the screenplay just doesn’t offer anything. You got all these Poe analogies and they don’t lead anywhere. Oh! You got a pit and pendulum. Oh! Scary. One of the real big problems was that you have this genius who doesn’t want to get his hands dirty. He messes up this criminal’s face to have him do his biding. “Not to dirty his hands”. And then what happens? almost half the murder plan, the surgeon’s hand is on the lever. Why even mess with the criminal? He’s basically a potted plant until the end.

Even though this is something to be part of the collection, I wouldn’t be that eager to buy a copy. If we were getting all the great Universal movies, this is probably the last to pick up.

2 stars

Murders In The Rue Morgue (1932)

An evil doctor uses a carnival to mask his experiments with ape blood on women. A medical student catches wind of his plan and trys to stop him.

This is one of Bela Lugosi’s better films. I think it’s thanks to director/screenwriter Robert Florey and cinematographer Karl Fruend. Lugosi had experience with both men and was comfortable working with them. To put things simply, it’s a German horror film with American funding. You can see it in the set design, in the lighting, the camera work, even the script was a lift from Das Cabinet die Caligari (The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari) but uses an ape instead of a somnambulist. The trademarks of German Expressionism are there. This makes the movie, somewhat unique for it’s time.

There are some flaws to the movie, but I believe these flaws were either out of the hands of the crew or were, at the time, limits to the technology they had. Constant cuts from man in ape suit to chimpanzee is a bit annoying. Florey was irked when he was told to eject some humor into the story to “cut the tension“. I was irked too. The most the comedy was bad even for his time. It doesn’t work and feels ‘horned in at times. This has become somewhat the mark of the Hayes Code at the time.

This is a movie that needs to be in anyone’s horror collection. No ands, ifs, or buts. Get it! NOW!

Four stars.